Tuesday, February 2, 2010

SarahScamPAC: The Scam that is SarahPAC and the amateurs who get paid to make it worse!


Monday, February 1, 2010 must have been a hard day at SarahPAC Central.

SarahScamPAC is exposed.

SarahSalad writers are outted!

And now, President Obama is getting all the headlines with his bold (and scary) budget.


What to do? What to do? Good thing SarahPAC has her own personal PR and Political Consulting Firms to call on to keep her in the headlines!

- I know! I know! Let's write a SarahNOTE!

So the busy little marmots sharpen their claws & pencils, and have a peek at the Budget!

- Jeeezasss! Sarah, look at all these ZEROS!

- We don't know SHIT about this stuff! It's full of freaking NUMBERS! And these things called 'Entitlements'. WTF are those??

- Holy SHIT, this has to be projected for a whole YEAR?

- Some of this crap has to be planned for TEN EFFING YEARS! That's even farther off than 'Sarah! Sarah! 2012' !!! Who does that!

- Damn! Those lib-tards!. No fair! Damn Educated Elistist lib-tards!

- We can't do this! Can we just say he wants to kill the troops with Defense Cuts?

- OK. Don't panic. Let's USE ONE OF THE KIDS!

- Yeah! Good idea!

- Which one? The retard?

- You betcha, even the lib-tards love the Trig-Trick!

........... and so it goes! An outrage is born!. A diversion is created!

Tuesday morning, at SarahScamPAC Central:

- It worked! It worked! HuffPost picked up the SarahNOTE! Sam Stein is writing about it! WHEW! Mission Accomplished.

Yes! the SarahSalad Note got mentionned on HuffPost.com.

Yes! there were 1000s of comments!

OOPS! Most of them pointing out exactly what SarahScamPAC was trying to deflect!

Good Grief! You'd think SarahPAC was paying High School girls and Bloggers in Pyjamas to do her PR and Political Consulting wouldn't you?

How did this Goat Rodeo of a PR fiasco happen?

A recent story in the The Wall Street Journal has given Sarah's Note-writer a handy little shiny object for the Palinbots to focus on; lucky break! This week, the last thing SarahCentral wants is Palinbots, hungry for news about Sarah, to be going out into the real world and reading about the SarahScamPAC !

So, lucky for them, an old story about Rahm Emmanuel surfaced! Nothing Palinbots like more than find a word they 'understand' to get outraged! OUTRAGED! about.

Not a diversion, some might say? Hmmm well, the 'Timeline for Slow Readers' (or is that Non Readers?) goes like this:

TUESDAY, January 26, 2010: Story by Peter Wallsten appears in the WSJ that reports

The friction was laid bare in August when Mr. Emanuel showed up at a weekly strategy session featuring liberal groups and White House aides. Some attendees said they were planning to air ads attacking conservative Democrats who were balking at Mr. Obama's health-care overhaul.

"F—ing retarded," Mr. Emanuel scolded the group, according to several participants. He warned them not to alienate lawmakers whose votes would be needed on health care and other top legislative items.

WEDNESDAY, January 27, 2010 Rahm Emmanuel, according to Politico

....called Tim Shriver Wednesday to apologize and the apology was accepted," the official said.

Shriver is the Chairman and CEO of the Special Olympics, which has launched a campaign against what it calls "the R word."

January 30-31 2010: Disclosure Statements are released by SarahPAC detailing the financial INs & OUTs of the $2.1 Million Piggy-bank-with-Lipstick that SarahGrifter 'controls'. As most of us know, the smart folks at Palingates had a busy weekend following every disbursement and tracking down the 'owners' of several firms providing 'Political Consultancy' services to SarahPAC.

WHAT? The founders of conservatives4palin registered a company (within days of Bristol's! Coincidence!) that collected ***** from SarahPAC?

WHAT? That private jet, was ALSO paid for by SarahPAC? The All-American girl, on her cross-county tour meeting thousands of first-time reader, didn't REALLY ride that SarahPAC-PAID-FOR bus all over real America? We knew that of course, but it's always nice to have official documentation, isn't it?

WHAT? The shrink-wrap for that SarahBUS was paid for by SarahPAC?

WHAT? SarahPAC bought over $60,000 worth of SarahSalad books to 'give' to donors? Oh yea, I remember that! A $100.00+ donation to SarahPAC got you an autographed copy of the book! Bought by SarahPAC for SarahPAC as gifts to donors.

WHAT? SarahPAC bought an automatic signing machine?

NOW THAT is too hilarious, and as Bobbie Wilkins, an astute FB friend posted

I think that is pretty funny...Why would you want a book written by someone else that a machine signed?? No logic there....

Indeed; but ... as we all know, logic and Palinbots are like ... like ... well, like "palinbots" and "real people". Never the twain shall meet!

I could go on and on, but you get the drift of this grift, don't you. Read more at Palingates.

So, Monday, in an attempt to find some SHINY OBJECTS for Sarah's Palinbots to focus on, the old story about Rahm's comment -- which had NOTHING TO DO WITH TRIG --- was incorporated into a SarahSalad Note for her Facebook page.

I am just having a laugh, watching SarahEgo set up her 'friends' (sound familiar, Alaskans?) in jobs and positions that they are CLEARLY not qualified to do.

A Scam is a Scam is a Scam. Ask Maddoff and his friends! (wink!)

They could be pyramids.

Some are more like trees.

But, SarahScamPAC is more like a CIRCLE SCAM (ahem, you know what I mean?)

SarahGrifter pays bloggers to write those Facebook notes....

.....paid by her SarahScamPAC donations......

.....Donations from gullible people who send her their hard earned money...

Hard earned money used to pay grifter expenses like a private jet and designer dressed bus on her book tour........

For a book tour that sold books to put money in her pocket........

...... when buying her OWN books with SarahScamPAC donations.


  1. Beautiful post. Bravo!

  2. Funnier than hell! And thanks for updating the 'bots ravings. They make me so proud! : /

  3. Excellent! now put on your steel toes and apply downward pressure at a 45 degree angle w/ a sharp twist!(figuratively)--from day one, this totally ficticious character was assembled for amusement/distraction of poor deluded,depressed,stressed folks full of hatred/bitterness at their economic situation, due to the corrupt political class -- at the very least we can cause them some stress... keep the fire burning! ck out Caribou Barbie's Going Rogue DreamCastle...but she's still begging for loot for her phony legal defense fund?


  4. Clamshell:

    You don't need Sarah's table scraps anymore.

    You have the goods on her.

    Write a book.

    Become a millionaire.

    Sometimes we women need to disconnect our ovaries...

    And think.

  5. Palin lies and lies and lies. On the other hand, Levi Johnston has no reason to lie. I believe him when he says Palin uses the word "retarded" to refer to her own child. She's a world-class fraud. I really pity her poor kids who she continues to exploit without conscience.

  6. I guess Sarah would rather pay ignorant help than put her "journalism degree to good use."

    In case anybody wasn't aware, she's going to be on Chris Wallace's Fox Sunday Morning. THAT will be an interesting thing to discuss on Monday morning! Maybe she'll coin a new word. "Mandation" is so old.

  7. Man, if a smiling, laying on the charm, Sarah sprang a non-disclosure agreement on me out of the blue, I know that would be the last time I ever saw her smile. It would be bottom of the bus time. Nothing but threats thereafter.

    No effing way would I sign one of those.

  8. Clamshell? Who is clamshell?

    ....... and what does clamshell know?

    C'mon! give! (wink!)

  9. Sunnyjane, I've repeatedly commented on other blogs that Sarah could never stand on her own if she was actually questioned on a Sunday morning show but since it's on FOX, I really don't have high hopes for her. It's too soon for them to reveal that she's a fraud although I do believe when the ratings warrant it, they will not hesitate to cut her loose and go all out with the questions she's unable to answer.

    I love, love, love the 'bot posts with your replies. They are always good for a laugh and reveal the low I.Q. behind much of SP's minions. Great work!


  10. By the way, they can't count too well, either. A million donors each donating $1k is the equivalent of $1 billion, not trillion. Not to mention, she doesn't have that many donors or anywhere near that. But they are nothing if not unrealistic as evidenced by their talk of her as President. They actually think she should be able to just throw President Obama out now, don't wait for elections. Queen Quitter can do whatever she wants in their eyes! As I said in the previous post, low I.Q.--can't count, and they don't understand the Constitution, including SP. Remember how the VP position was "flexible"?

  11. Julie (former Palintologist)February 5, 2010 at 10:10 AM

    From "Game Change" (page 284):

    "(McCain) was disgusted by Republicans in Congress and talk radio gasbags such as Rush Limbaugh who bashed immigrants. 'They're going to destroy the fucking party,' he would say.

    As McCain's town hall meetings devolved into shouting matches over immigration, the candidate let his frustration show through. He called Lindsey Graham in despair. Listen to these people, McCain said. Why would I want to be the leader of a party of such assholes?"

    From page 422:

    "The general's (Powell) repudiation was a stinging blow for McCain. Beyond their longtime friendship, Powell represented the same brand of Republicanism as McCain's. Tough on defense. Fiscally prudent. Pragmatic and nondoctrinaire. McCain had to wonder what had become of him if his current incarnation was repelling someone like Powell. He was startled by the crazies at his rallies. Who were they? Why were they there? And what did they see in him?"

    They were Palinbots, John.

    Archivist: A beloved fellow conservative. Much beloved. Sorry I can't give you more.

  12. Rational ConservativeFebruary 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM

    The SarahPAC Disclosure Statements reveal, in black and white, that Sarahland is phony: beneath it lies, all too clearly, a kind of shame - shame at the ease with which the Palinbots have been seduced, and at how naked their desire is for Sarah's narrative, however improbable or tendentious or convenient, to be true.

    The fact that it has become clear that Sarahland is a fiction will not bother some Palinbots; for them, what matters are the "passions" from which Sarahland has been constructed. The truth, we all know, is happening in our lives, all around us. But it cannot be equal to Sarahland.

    All of this based on Sarah, a person driven by fear of humiliation and an insatiable hunger for validation.

    It's terribly sad when you think about it.

  13. On 01/28/2010 Sarah told Greta:
    "There's commercials out there that belittle women and demean them and make them feel like sex objects and I haven't heard a whole lot of protest from N.O.W. on that."
    Typical Palinbot argument:
    "Most of us are Sarah Palins to one degree or another. Palin so very clearly reflects the lifestyle choices, hard work ethic, and traditional values that so many women admire.”

    One sign of our cultural memory disorder is that you can describe a female governor of a state as “traditional” and not get laughed at. Sarah is, of course, not a traditional woman. In a traditional family, a wife and mother does not pursue success outside her own home. Traditionally, women were not considered suited to economic or professional independence, let alone political leadership, no matter what they had accomplished. Billie Jean King was the winner of three Wimbledon titles in a single year and was supporting her household with the money she made from tennis, but she could not get a credit card unless it was in the name of her husband, a law student with no income. Unquestioned male authority is the basis of traditional marriage.

    Conservatives like me have long been criticized for telling women that they could have it all. But Christian Conservative Activists have done us one better: apparently, you can have it all and be traditional, too. Mrs. McCain told George Stephanopolous that she asked Palin, just after she was picked for the Republican national ticket, how Palin would reconcile her responsibilities as a mother with her prospective job. “She looked me square in the eye,” Mrs. McCain recounted, “and she said, ‘You know something? I’m a mother. I can do it.’” It used to be that Christian Conservative Activists thought motherhood disqualified women for full-time careers; now they’ve decided that it’s a credential for higher office. Gratefully, no one else has arrived at that conclusion or Octomom would be POTUS.